Christopher Boehm Harvard University Press 1999 FROM THE BACK COVER: Are humans by nature hierarchical or egalitarian? Hierarchy in the Forest addresses this question by examining the evolutionary origins of social and political behavior. Tracing our contradictory egalitarian and despotic traits to their roots in chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, and early human societies, Christopher Boehm extends the domain of biological anthropology and evolutionary biology into a new realm: the evolutionary basis of genuine altruism. Christopher Boehm is Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Jane Goodall Research Center at the University of Southern California. CONTENTS: 1. The Question of Egalitarian Society 1 2. Hierarchy and Equality 16 3. Putting Down Aggressors 43 4. Equality and Its Causes 64 5. A Wider View of Egalitarianism 90 6. The Hominoid Political Spectrum 125 7. Ancestral Politics 149 8. The Evolution of Egalitarian Society 171 9. Paleolithic Politics and Natural Selection 197 10. Ambivalence and Compromise in Human Nature 225 References 259 Index 281 FROM THE PREFACE: To one who is living one's life as a democrat, egalitarianism is a topic that affects not only the head, but the heart. My heart was in this book, not only in the research that underlies it, but in its writing. For egalitarianism, as opposed to actual equality, is intrinsic to the democracy that many people on this planet enjoy and often take for granted. We democrats live in societies that define us as political equals, and in spite of voter apathy and predatory lobbies we continue to wield our votes: the collective voice of the people continues to be, ultimately, powerful. It is this essential political leverage in the political decision-making process that keeps alive human freedom and human rights as we know them, and I shall argue that this type of political stance is quite ancient. We participate in this type of political leverage because we want to keep a say in our own governance, but, more basically, we exert it because we are suspicious of all governance and wish to limit the powers of those who lead and may try therefore to rule. To a democrat the power of centralized government, be it national or local, is a perpetual threat to the personal autonomy of its citizens, and ultimately it is the potential for rebellion by the rank and file that keeps our personal autonomies intact. We knowingly make a sensible compromise between maximization of personal freedom and the needs of a nation that must keep law and order and prevent civil war. Having made this implicit compromise, we tend to be vigilant about our rights-with good reason. Our earliest precursor, in this respect, may well have been an African ape living some 5 to 7 million years ago. This vanished ancestral hominoid was likely to have formed political coalitions that enabled the rank and file, those who otherwise would have been utterly subordinated, to whittle away at the powers of alpha individuals whose regular practice it was to bully them. Our direct evolutionary precursor was a human physically just like ourselves, who lived in the Late Paleolithic and possessed an egalitarian ethos and an egalitarian political order similar to those of present-day hunting bands who have remained nomadic. While this book mainly looks to the evolutionary origins of egalitarianism, and to its practice among extant foragers and the tribesmen who succeeded them, I have also included, in the next to last chapter, a more adventurous hypothesis about the natural selection of altruistic traits. This hypothesis would hold only if egalitarian society and the moral communities that made it possible were ancient, and if my speculations about selection mechanisms were credible. With respect to the possible (I think probable) evolution of genetic altruism in humans, I expect to raise considerable controversy among those who are biologically inclined. I can present no smoking gun, but rather a set of circumstances that could have favored a combination of enhanced group selection and effective suppression of free-riders. With respect to the overall evolution and phenotypic expression of political rebelliousness, I think I am on much firmer ground, and I present those hypotheses with confidence-even though I, like anyone else who tackles the Paleolithic, will of necessity be operating by means of triangulation when it comes to the social and political life of earlier humans. This book is not just about politics, then, but about the human capacity for altruism and also about morality more generally, about the moral communities in which humans lived prehistorically and especially about the political side of morality. The idea of people living morally as political equals is a beautiful one, but in an important sense it seems to go against human nature-a nature that leads, quite naturally, to interpersonal domination and to the formation of social dominance hierarchies, with alpha individuals presiding over them. My main hypothesis is that in holding onto their personal autonomies, the collective weapon of the rank and file has been their ability to define their own social life in moral terms, and to back up their thoughts about political parity with pointed actions in the form of collectivized social sanctioning. Egalitarian society would never have appeared in the absence of moral communities, and it is possible that prehistorically they emerged at the same time. In a sense, I am writing about the roots of democracy, and at times I shall depart from the historical-evolutionary context to comment on egalitarianism as it moved into larger societies: tribal republics, and both ancient and modern democracies. With respect to intentions, at least, the communist enterprises that have absorbed the world in this century are considered as experiments that were based on a tragically faulty assessment of human nature. But the main object of the book is to explain the political dynamics that make egalitarian societies possible at all levels, and to tie these dynamics to a human nature that definitely is in need of further definition and explanation. WHERE TO ORDER: Harvard University Press Customer Service Department 79 Garden Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 USA Fax: 1-800-962-4983 (within the United States and Canada) Phone: 1-800-448-2242 (within US and Canada) Email: Contact_HUP@harvard.edu Web Site: www.hup.harvard.edu PRICE: Cloth edition: $42.00 ISBN 0-674-39031-8 Paper edition: $20.00 ISBN 0-674-00691-7
URL: http://www.primate.wisc.edu/pin/review/hier.html
Page last modified:
January 17, 2002
Maintained by the WRPRC Library
Return to Review Copies Received
Return to PIN Home Page