Introduction
Since the 1940ís, very little information
has been available on the status of wildlife in Laos. In 1992,
wildlife surveys began as part of a protected area system development
project headed by the Lao governmentís Ministry of Agriculture
and Forestry with help from IUCN and a Swedish-funded forestry
project. Eighteen areas have been officially designated as National
Biodiversity Conservation Areas (NBCAs), and twelve others are
proposed for protection, together covering over 15% of Laosí
total land area (Berkmuller et al., 1995). The wildlife
surveys aimed to assess human pressures, identify areas of high
conservation importance, and provide management recommendations
for these NBCAs. The surveys conducted thus far have focused on
areas within the Annamite Mountains and Mekong Plains of central
and southern Laos. This paper provides an initial summary of
diurnal primate records during this period. The data were first
presented at the 1996 joint IPS - ASP meetings in Madison, Wisconsin
(Timmins and Ruggeri, 1996). The status and conservation of all
species in Laos will be covered in greater detail in forthcoming
papers.
Depending on the taxonomy used, between
14 and 18 species of primates are known from Laos, including two
species of loris (Nycticebus), five macaques (Macaca),
three Trachypithecus langurs, the Douc langur
(Pygathrix nemaeus), and at least four species of
gibbon (Hylobates). Eleven of Laosí 13 diurnal
species have been recorded during the last four years of surveys.
Primate Populations
Although quantification of primate populations
in Laos has not been possible, with the exception of gibbons in
a small number of areas (Duckworth et al., 1995), extensive
surveys have resulted in over 300 encounters with diurnal primates.
This allows a qualitative and comparative asessment to be made
of primate populations in the Annamite Mountains and Mekong Plains
regions of Laos.
Macaques (Macaca spp.)
The pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina)
and the Assamese macaque (M. assamensis) appear
to be the most widely distributed macaque species in the areas
surveyed. The majority of the pigtail macaque records have been
from below 600 m in degraded and secondary forest habitats, pine
forest and semi-deciduous habitats of the Mekong Plains region,
becoming more scarce in the evergreen forests of the Annamite
Mountains. This species appears to be broadly sympatric with
the rhesus macaque (M. mulatta ) in the north and
long-tailed macaque (M. fascicularis ) in the south.
Assamese macaques also are widespread through
central and southern Laos but are found predominantly in the evergreen
forests of the Annamites, making this species broadly allopatric
with pigtail macaques. They have rarely been encountered in heavily
degraded or semi-deciduous habitats. Interestingly, it appears
to be the most common species of macaque within areas of karst
limestone. The species appears to be broadly sympatric with stumptail
macaques (M. arctoides ) over their range.
Rhesus macaques have perhaps the most restricted
range of all the macaques so far recorded in Laos. Over 40 of
the 47 encounters with the species occured in riverine habitats,
many of which were degraded. The species appears to be absent,
or at least very uncommon, below approximately 15o
N.
The long-tailed macaque appears to be restricted
to southern Laos and has only been recorded below 16o
N. The species appears to have similar
habitat requirements to the closely related rhesus macaque. There
have been very high encounter rates from riverine habitats at
one site, while other non-riverine records have been from degraded
forest habitats, particularly mosaic habitat types.
Although stumptail macaques have been found
over much the same range as Assamese macaques, they appear to
be somewhat less common. There have been 14 encounters with this
species from five areas. As with the Assamese macaque, several
of the lowest altitudinal records have come from limestone areas.
Langurs (Trachypithecus
spp.)
Two subspecies of Francoisí langur
(Trachypithecus francoisi ) have so far been recorded
from Laos. Both have been seen in the central region, predominantly
associated with a homologous limestone formation that stretches
across central Indochina. This limestone covers over 3500 km2
in Laos. In the west of this limestone area, the subspecies T.
f. laotum, which has a very distinctive white band
around the head, has been found to be locally common. However,
in the eastern portion along the Vietnamese border, an all black
form has been found, apparently bordering the range of the subspecies
T. f. hatinhensis in Vietnam. There appear to be
no natural barriers among these three forms.
There have been only seven encounters with
the silvered langur (T. cristatus ). The species
appears to be restricted to the south, with a distribution similar
to the long-tailed macaque, south of 16o
N. Most records also have come from
the lowlands in riverine, degraded and mosaic habitats.
Phayreís langur (T. phayrei
) appears to be a northern species, with only six records
from seven areas, all to the north of 17o30í
N. The species appears to occur at low density in a wide variety
of habitats, including limestone, riverine, evergreen and degraded
forests. Reports suggest that this species may be more common
in northern Laos.
Douc Langur
(Pygathrix nemaeus )
The Douc langur appears to have a wide distribution
within central and southern Laos, with over 40 encounters from
seven areas. Records have come from a wide altitude range, from
200 to 1400 m. Although apparently common at at least three sites
surveyed, the species is scarce in several others, and is probably
absent from the extreme south. Douc langurs appear to have declined
or been lost from several areas in recent years, particularly
from degraded forest areas and smaller isolated forests. They
appear to be more susceptible to human pressures due either to
hunting or habitat degredation than several of the macaque species.
Gibbons (Hylobates
spp.)
No recent field information has been gathered
on the lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) although it probably
still survives in forests west of the Mekong river in northern
Laos.
The pileated gibbon (H. pileatus )
has been found only west of the Mekong in the far south, where
approximately 500 km2
of suitable lowland forest remains in Laos.
There have been no further records of the
black gibbon (H. concolor) since the discovery of
H. c. lu from a locality in northwestern
Laos earlier this century.
The white-cheeked/yellow-cheeked group of
gibbons (H. leucogenys/gabriellae) appears to be
the most widely distributed of the diurnal primates in Laos. They
have been recorded in most areas surveyed, over a wide altitudinal
range of 100 to 1800 m. At least two forms have been found, although
their taxonomy and distribution remains unclear. The highest
calling densities have been associated with the largest tracts
of least disturbed forest. In the two largest of these areas,
each with a forest cover of over 1000 km2,
gibbon populations are estimated to comprise between 400-6000
groups. Gibbons have disappeared from smaller tracts of forest
and several selectively logged and other degraded areas, probably
as a direct result of human persecution.
Summary
Of particular importance in a global conservation
context are the Lao populations of Francoisí langur, Douc
langur and the white-cheeked/yellow-cheeked group of gibbons,
all of which are restricted to Indochina. The populations in
Laos of each of these species possibly are the largest in the
world. The protected area complex within central Laos (four NBCAs
and three proposed areas) may be the most important for primate
conservation, supporting five other diurnal primate species in
addition to these three. The southern complex of protected areas
also is important (two NBCAs and three proposed areas), particularly
for gibbon populations, and supports at least seven diurnal primate
species, including two not found in the central protected area
complex.
It is clear that the majority of primate
species still have relatively large populations within Laos.
This, despite intense hunting pressures, is due mostly to the
large size of forested areas that serve as the greatest protection
for the primate populations. Unfortunately, the designation of
protected areas is unlikely to offer much increased protection
in the near future due to a lack of funds, trained personnel and
conservation infrastructure. The forested areas continue to be
cleared for cultivation, commercial logging and hydropower development.
Surrounding these areas is a country that is turning to a consumer
economy, including expanding markets for wildlife products. Much
further attention, both in research and funding, needs to be brought
to Laos if primate populations are to be protected.
References
Berkmuller, K., Evans, T.D., Timmins, R.J. and Venevongpet (1995) Recent advances in nature conservation in the Lao PDR. Oryx 29:253-260.
Duckworth, J.R., Timmins, R.J., Anderson, G.Q.A., Thewlis, R.M., Nemeth, E., Evans, T.D., Dvorak, M. and Cozza, K.E.A. (1995) Notes on the status and conservation of the gibbon Hylobates (Nomascus) gabriellae in Laos. Tropical Biodiversity 3:15-27.
Timmins, R.J. and Ruggeri, N. (1996)
Status of primates in Laos. Paper presented at the XVIth Congress
of the International Primatological Society and the XIXth Conference
of the American Society of Primatologists, Madison, Wisconsin.
Current populations of proboscis monkeys
(Nasalis larvatus) have been estimated to be less
than 5,000 individuals (Yeager and Blondal, 1992). The largest
protected population is located in Tanjung Puting National Park
in Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia. More recent census work suggests
that this protected population estimate may be too high.
Data collected in Central Kalimantan suggest
that proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) are found
in low densities (less than one group per 2 km of riverbank) [unpublished
data; Chalmers, 1992; Yeager, 1993]. There are a few small forest
reserves (at least two or three on local maps) located in these
areas, but the total protected population is extremely small (probably
less than 50 animals per reserve). In addition, proboscis monkeys
are regularly hunted for food in this area. In Banjarmasin, Southern
Kalimantan, high densities (approximately 60 individuals per km2)
were observed on small forest fragments (less than approximately
100 ha) located on islands and river edges (unpublished data;
Yeager, 1993). Many trees were stripped of foliage and as fragments
were isolated and probably comprise less than 5% of the landscape;
it is unlikely that these populations are viable long term. The
total protected population in the Banjarmasin region is approximately
51 individuals, located on the Pulau Kaget Reserve.
In Brunei Darussalam, there is no officially
protected population. The total population size of Brunei Bay
appeared to be less than 600 animals, with a density of 4.78 individuals
per km2
(Yeager, 1995). The total population size for Sarawak, Malaysia,
is approximately 1000, with approximately 300 animals protected
(Bennett, 1986).
Since 1989, approximately one third of the
local habitat at Natai Lengkuas Station, Tanjung Puting National
Park (Indonesia) has been severely degraded from a combination
of fire, logging and illegal gold mining (Yeager, 1992). Changes
in proboscis monkey group stability, mean group size and group
composition have been observed. Group stability appears to have
declined. One adult female with an infant changed groups at least
four times during a one-year period. Mean group size for male
groups declined from 12.1 in 1985 to 11.0 in 1995.
The sex/age composition (adult male: adult
female: infants: immature) has shifted from 1:5:4:2.6 in 1985
to 1:4.9:4.1:1. There has been a significant decline (160%) in
the number of immature individuals (juvenile and adolescents)
per group. As there has not been a significant increase in the
size or number of non-reproductive groups (groups containing immatures
and adult males) in the area, it would appear that the immatures
are either suffering higher mortality rates or are emigrating
out of the study area. Very young juveniles were observed in non-reproductive
groups, indicating that immatures may be leaving their groups
at an earlier age.
Similar increases in habitat degradation
have been occurring throughtout the park over the past decade.
Presumably this is also affecting their group size and group
structure. This population is the largest protected population
of proboscis monkeys in the world. If recruitment at the immature
stage continues to decline, this threatened population will be
at risk of local extinction.
References
Bennett, E.L. (1986) Proboscis monkeys in Sarawak: their ecology, status, conservation and management WWF-Malaysia/NYZS report no. MAL 63/84.
Yeager, C.P. (1992) Changes in proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) group size and density at Tanjung Puting National Park, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia. Tropical Biodiversity 1:49-55.
Yeager, C.P. (1995) Does intraspecific variation in social systems explain reported differences in the social structure of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis Larvatus)? Primates 36:577-584.
Yeager, C.P. and Blondal, T.K. (1992)
Conservation status of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus)
at Tanjung Puting National Park, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia.
Pp.220-228 in G. Ismail, M. Mohamed and S. Omar eds., Forest
Biology and Conservation in Borneo. Yayasan Sabah
Center for Borneo Studies, Publication No. 2.
Table 1. Estimates of Proboscis Monkey
Group Size and Density
Location Group Size Ind. Den./Km2 Year
Kalimantan
Camp Leakey 6.6
~33.0
1980-81
Natai Lengkuas 12.1 62.9 1985
10.8 ~52.0 1992
~11.0
~57.2
1995
S. Buluh Besar
~11.0
~25.0
1989
Moera Tehweh
~5.0 1993
Banjarmasin
~11.2
1993
Sarawak
Samunsam ~13.3 1970's
11.4
11.9 1984-86
Brunei
Darussalam
Brunei Bay 20.0 14.4 1962
~10.8
4.8 1991
The Mentawai Islands of Siberut, Sipora
and North and South Pagai lie 85 to 135 km off the west coast
of Sumatra, Indonesia. These islands have the highest density
per land area of endemic primates (three at the species level
and one genus) and a little studied and unique fauna and flora.
The Mentawais also suffer from rapid deforestation and land degradation.
The northernmost island, Siberut, has recently received much
attention (including being named a biosphere reserve), while the
southern islands, Sipora and North and South Pagai, have been
relatively ignored by the general scientific community.
Sipora and the Pagais contain all four endemic
Mentawai primates, and at least three of them are endemic at the
subspecific level. These primates are: Kloss's gibbon (Hylobates
klossii), the Mentawai Island langur (Presbytis
potenziani potenziani), the pig-tailed langur (Simias
concolor concolor), and the Mentawai macaque (Macaca
pagensis pagensis ). No complete primate census of the
southern islands has been performed and only a handful of researchers
have observed the Mentawai primates on these islands (Fuentes,
1994, 1996, in press; Fuentes and Olson, 1995; Fuentes and Tenaza,
1996; Kawamura and Megantara, 1986; Olson, 1992; Tenaza, 1987,
1989; Tenaza and Fuentes, 1995).
Sipora and the Pagai Islands were the most
recently colonized by humans (approximately 200-400 years ago)
and are the most heavily impacted of the Mentawai chain (ICMP,
1995; Fuentes, 1994; Tenaza, 1987). It was on the Pagais that
Christian missionaries first began converting the indigenous Mentawains,
that logging companies began intensive, large scale felling, and
that a cash economy and its subsequent impact on forest/marine
products collection were felt. However, all three of these islands
contain remaining tracts of forest and other habitats that are
utilized by nonhuman primates.
This report is the product of a recent census
and survey of the Pagai Islands in 1996 (AF and ER), the results
of observations and interviews with Mentawai Islanders conducted
in 1989, 1992 and 1996 (AF) and a review of the existing literature
on the Mentawai primates and the southern Mentawai Islands. This
report presents our estimates of the current status of primates
and their habitats on Sipora and the Pagais.
Results
Sipora, at 845 km2,
is the third largest Mentawai Island. The human population as
of 1995 was reported to be approximately 9,000 inhabitants living
in one large town (Sioban) and numerous villages throughout the
island. Estimates of total forest cover remaining vary but, given
that logging has been extensive and that four logging companies
remain active, previous estimates of 20% of the total land mass
(as of 1990) are probably too high. Conversations with local
officials in the main town of Sioban in March of 1996 suggest
that 10-15% is a more realistic number at present. This would
represent approximately 85-127 km2
of remaining forest. Known primate
density for areas of North and South Pagai primary forest (Tenaza,
1987; Fuentes, 1994; Fuentes and Ray, in prep) is between 33.7
(minimum estimate) and 59 (maximum estimate) individuals per km2,
based on both calling and transect methods
at two sites (Brockelman and Ali, 1987; Brockelman and Srikosamatara,
1993). Using these numbers provides a crude estimate of the Sipora
primate population at approximately 2,865-4,280 (minimum) or 5,000-7,500
(maximum) in primary forest.
Most of Sipora's arable land has been converted to wet rice cultivation and swidden agricultural plots, and large tracts of land have been cleared for maize and other dry crop agriculture for settlements of transmigrants from the island of Java. Also, the logging companies' few replanting efforts have concentrated on monoculture (primarily various eucalyptus and Shorea spp.). Given these land use practices, the potential land available for primates outside of the remaining primary forest is rather small. Additionally, according to individuals from Sioban, erosion has recently begun to affect previously logged or utilized, then abandoned, hillsides throughout the island.
Hunting of the four Mentawai primates is still practiced on Sipora. Although the utilization of traditional hunting methods has dramatically decreased (see Tenaza, 1987, 1989 for the Pagais), they have been replaced with more opportunistic hunting ventures using air rifles. At present there are no Mentawai primates left around the town of Sioban; however, hunters from Sioban occasionally travel to the north of the islands to take monkey, gibbon and bird prey. In addition, opportunistic hunting is quite common in any forest areas near villages or along logging roads and intervillage paths.
The Pagais have a total land area of 1,675
km2
(approximately 775 km2
for North Pagai and 900 km2
for South Pagai) and make up over 25% of the total Mentawai land
mass. The 1995 human population was reported at approximately
22,000, with about 4,000 in the main town of Sikakap (and its
immediate area) and the remaining population spread throughout
47 small villages. Previous estimates (1990) of forest cover
suggested 17-20% of the primary forest remained (R. Tenaza, pers.
comm.), but our recent visit to the Pagais suggests that this
number is no longer accurate. The entire 400 km2
timber concession on North Pagai has been logged, and the main
logging company is now in the final stages of extraction on their
500 km2
concession on South Pagai. Additionally, at least one company
presently is involved in intensive logging activity in many of
the coastal areas of both North and South Pagai. If we assume
a reduction to 15% primary forest cover and use the primate population
density estimates calculated from the two sites on North and South
Pagai (see above), we estimate a total of 8,467-14,833 primates
remaining in primary habitat.
Unlike much of Sipora, on the Pagais there
remain many tracts of disturbed secondary forest and mixed swamp
forest (see WWF, 1980 for forest descriptions; ICMP, 1995). Observations
of primates in very disturbed habitats on the Pagais have been
reported by Fuentes (1994, pers. ob.), Olson (1992, pers. comm.)
and R. Tenaza (1987, pers. comm.). Given that some areas not
described as primary forest cover are utilized by the Mentawai
primates and that these areas make up an area possibly equal to
or larger than the remaining forest cover, it is possible that
the actual number of Mentawai primates on the Pagais is substantially
larger than 8,467 - 14,833. In fact, the non-primary areas utilized
by primates in the Pagais may be as high as 10-20% of the land
area. However, it is important to note that only two of the four
primate species (the Mentawai Island langur and the Mentawai macaque)
have been reported to regularly utilize these disturbed areas,
and one (Simias concolor ) to infrequently use them
(Fuentes, 1994; Fuentes and Olson, 1995; Tenaza, 1987).
The rate of hunting varies around the Pagais.
In general, hunting is no longer done with bow and poison arrows
but rather with air rifles with poison pellets. However, organized
primate hunts are infrequent. The standard hunt consists of two
or more men armed with air rifles moving through the forest shooting
at any animal they come across. This has led to the local extinction
of many primate species around villages and in what were once
favored hunting areas. A good example of this would be Simalegu
islet near Sinakak village on South Pagai, which R. Tenaza reported
to contain approximately 60-70 Simias concolor
in 1986. Our recent surveys of this islet coupled with interviews
with the local villagers confirmed that there are at most 1 or
2 groups remaining on the islet (4-12 animals). Regular hunting
by at least one village, possibly two, has decimated this isolate
population in ten years. On the other hand, the area surrounding
Betumonga village on North Pagai, where hunting is infrequent,
has numerous groups of all four primate species. Interviews with
the villagers, in 1992 and 1996, revealed that there are only
a few hunters left in the village and that hunting for primates
only occurs about 5-7 times a year. As the younger men move away
from traditional hunting and subsistence collection towards cash
crop/forest product collection for the emerging cash economy,
the actual predation danger on the local primates is reduced.
Discussion
For the Mentawai primates on the island
of Sipora the future looks bleak. The government of Indonesia
has more transmigrants scheduled for the island, four logging
companies remain active, and forest product extraction (primarily
rotan) continues at a breadneck pace. A growing human population
and no scientific research taking place or proposed coupled with
no protected forest areas indicate very little chance of Sipora's
primates surviving long into the next century. Although isolated
pockets of monkeys may survive, it is most likely that the four
species of Mentawai primates have no future on the Island of Sipora.
On the Pagais the situation, although bleak,
has a few promising notes. The southern end of South Pagai Island
is not scheduled for any logging activities, has a very small
human population and posesses much primary and swamp forest utilized
by the Mentawai primates (potentially as much as 3,000+ ha on
the southern peninsula and small islets). Additionally, this
area has been put forward by R. Tenaza as a potential marine/forest
reserve. On North Pagai the only large stand of forest remaining
is in the southwestern region (Betumonga region, about 1,000+
ha of primary/mixed forest). In this area research was conducted
in 1991 (M. Olson), 1992 (A. Fuentes) and is currently the site
of a two-year research project headed by L. Paciulli of the State
University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook. It is highly likely
that as long as research projects are being undertaken in this
area both the forest and the primates within it will be protected.
However, the general trend in the Pagais
is one of continued logging activity, dramatically increased forest
products extraction and sporadic primate hunting. The government
of Indonesia also recently re-designated North Pagai as a site
for the transmigration program.
Conclusion
With the increase in human population the
area needed for subsistence gardens and cash crops increases.
This increase in forest conversion for gardens (near the coast)
coupled with the extensive logging activities (throughout the
islands' interior) dramatically decreases the available habitat
for nonhuman primates. Many of these primates will be forced
into suboptimal habitats and thus be easier prey for occasional
human predation. Overall, the effects of increased human population,
continued deforestation and sporadic hunting continue to have
a major impact on the populations of Mentawai primates of the
islands of Sipora, North Pagai and South Pagai.
It is very likely that unless the southern
South Pagai region is officially designated a reserve, and is
enforced as one, and researchers continue to show interest in
the Betumonga region of North Pagai that these areas will succumb
to the external pressures as well. While there are probably well
over 12,000, possibly as many as 20,000, Mentawai primates remaining
on these southern islands, that number could well be halved before
the end of the next decade.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Primate Conservation,
Inc., Lilian Hirt and the Department of Anthropology at the University
of California, Berkeley for the funding of this research. We
also would like to thank Ricardo Simanjantuk and Januar Sakrebau
for their assistance in the field, Berlin and Pak James and family
for their hospitality, and the people of Betumonga, Sinakak, Sikakap,
and Sioban for all of their assistance.
References
Brockelman, W.Y. and Ali, R. (1987) Methods of surveying and sampling forest primate populations. Pp. 23-62 in C.W. Marsh and R.A. Mittermeier, Primate Conservation in the Tropical Rainforest. Alan R. Liss, New York.
Brockelman, W.Y. and Srikosamatara,
S. (1993) Estimation of density of gibbon groups by use of
loud songs. American Journal of Primatology 29:93-108
Fuentes, A. (1994) The socioecology of the Mentawai Island langur (Presbytes potenziani ) Ph.D. thesis University of California at Berkley
Fuentes, A. (in press) Evolution of social organization in the Mentawai Island langur (Presbytis potenziani)). Proceedings of the XVth Congress of the International Primatological Society. Current Primatology.
Fuentes, A. (1996) Feeding and ranging in the Mentawai Island langur (Presbytis potenziani). International Journal of Primatology 17:525-548.
Fuentes, A. and Tenaza, R.R. (1996) Infant parking in pig-tailed langurs (Simias concolor). Folia Primatologica 65:172-173.
Fuentes, A. and Olson, M. (1995) Preliminary observations and status of the Pagai macaque (Macaca pagensis). Asian Primates 4(4):1-4.
ICMP (1995) Siberut National Park and
integrated conservation and management plan.
Biodiversity Conservation Project in Flores and Siberut, Asian Development Bank (ADB) Loan 1187-INO.
Kawamura, S. and Megantara, E.N. (1986) Observation of primates in logged forest on Sipora Island, Mentawai. Kyoto Overseas Research Report of Studies on Non-Human Primates 5:1-12
Olson, M. (1992) Habits of the four sympatric Mentawai primates in the Pagai Islands, Indonesia. M.S. Thesis University of the Pacific.
Tenaza, R.R. (1987) Studies of primates and their habitats in the Pagai Islands, Indonesia. Primate Conservation 8:104-110
Tenaza, R.R. (1989) Primates on a precarious limb. Animal Kingdom 92(6):26-37.
Tenaza, R. and Fuentes, A. (1995) Monandrous social organization of Pig-tailed langurs (Simias concolor) in the Pagai Islands, Indonesia International Journal of Primatology 16:195-210.
World Wildlife Fund (1980). Saving
Siberut: A Conservation Master Plan. WWF, Switzerland.
Bherjan, Borajan and Podumoni are three
tiny reserved forests (RF) located in the plains of the Tinsukia
district of eastern Assam. Bherjan RF ( 27o32'N,
95o
23'E ) covers an area of 1.05 km2,
Borajan RF ( 27o25'N,
95o
22'E ) 4.93 km2
and Podumoni RF (27o
32'N, 95o19'E)
1.76 km2.
The three areas are disjunct and separated by tea plantations
and human habitation.
Six primate species occur in these tiny
pockets, making them among the best areas for primate observation,
photography and conservation-education. A detailed survey was
carried out in September and November 1995 (Choudhury, 1995).
The species recorded were: slow loris (Nycticebus coucang),
pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina), rhesus
macaque (M. mulatta), Assamese macaque (M.
assamensis), capped langur (Trachypithecus
[=Presbytis] pileatus) and hoolock
gibbon (Hylobates hoolock).
The slow
loris was not uncommon in the past. In Bherjan one was recorded
in 1991, suggesting its continued presence. In Podumoni, the last
confirmed records were in the 1960's. There are similar reports
from Borajan.
The pigtail macaque is still common in the
forests. Two groups totaling about 40 monkeys were observed in
Bherjan. A group of 16 macaques was observed in Podumoni RF while
two groups totaling about 45 were seen in Borajan RF. It is possible
that at least one more group was in both Podumoni and Borajan.
Total population number is around 130 with the group size ranging
from 16 to 25.
Although the rhesus macaque is common in
the adjacent tea gardens and villages, it does not occur in groups
in any of these forests. Only a few lone males were observed,
often stealthily following either a group of pigtail or Assamese
macaques.
The Assamese macaque is also common in all
of the forests. Three groups totaling about 40 monkeys were observed
in Bherjan RF. Another group was observed in a bamboo grove on
Athelbari Tea Estate, north of Bherjan. In Podumoni, two groups
with more than 24 macaques were seen. In Borajan, 15 monkeys were
observed in two groups. It is possible that one more group was
in both of these forests. The total Assamese macaques in these
forests is more than 100 with group-size varying from four to
17.
No report of any past record of the stumptail
macaque (Macaca arctoides) could be found in Bherjan
and Podumoni RF's. However, a few reports have been received from
Borajan RF. But no evidence of present existence could be found.
Borajan was once contiguous with Upper Dihing (west block) RF,
where the macaque is still found in small numbers. Tea plantations
and human habitations have separated the former area from the
larger latter area. The stumptail macaque may now be treated
as locally extinct in Borajan RF.
Two groups of capped langurs totaling about
25 occur in Borajan RF. In Podumoni, a group of five was observed
on several occasions. However, the species has become locally
extinct in Bherjan RF. The langurs nearest to Bherjan RF are found
in the village woodlands of Hatipoti, 3.5 km north, where only
two are surviving. The total estimated population, including those
of Hatipoti, is around 40. Group size ranged from five to 15,
excluding the langurs of Hatipoti.
Around the late 1960's, the hoolock gibbon vanished from Podumoni RF. It also is on the verge of extinction in Bherjan RF, with only a lone female surviving. In the early 1970's, some seven to eight gibbons were in Bherjan, but they were reduced to a pair in 1986-87. The male subsequently was killed by some tea garden laborers in 1987-88, and since then the lone female has been without a mate. Outside the reserve, however, there are gibbons in at least three village woodlands. The nearest population, consisting of three males, is only 200 m away from the northeastern corner of Bherjan, but still this small gap has become a significant barrier for the gibbons. This shows the vulnerbility of the species to even small gaps in forest habitat.
About 30 gibbons in seven groups have been
located in Borajan RF. Three groups have been studied in detail.
There was one lone male and one lone female. These solitary animals
were not attached to any group. Group size ranged from three
to five.
Habitat destruction is the major threat
to the survival of primates in these tiny forests. Original rain
forest has been destroyed to a great extent in Podumoni and Borahan
RF's. In Bherjan RF, plantations of deciduous trees now cover
more than half of the area but the condition of the habitat is
still better than that of the other two areas. Poaching is not
a serious problem in the areas, and this is the main reason for
such abundance of primates in tiny pockets.
To protect the surviving primates (may not
be viable for long term), a proposal has been submitted to the
Government of Assam, for declaring these forests as a wildlife
sanctuary (in short, may be called BBP Sanctuary) (Choundhury,
1995). It is very likely that the sanctuary will be notified within
1996 as the response from the government was positive.
The results of detailed field observations on behaviors such as time-budgeting, ranging, reproduction, feeding and ecology are being analyzed for future publication.
Acknowledgements
Part of this study was supported by a Conservation
Small Grant from the American Society of Primatologists. For
assistance during field surveys, I thank the local Forest staff
posted at Bordubi Beat (Borajan), Bherijan and Podumoni, and also
many local villagers and tea garden laborers. Nur Hussain, Dilip
Handique and Babul Denath accompanied me on many of the trips,
and I thank them all.
References
Choudhury, Anwaruddin (1995) Wildlife
Survey in Bherjan, Borajan, & Podumoni Reserved Forests of
Tinsukia District, Assam, with a proposal for a Wildlife Sanctuary.
The Rhino Foundation for Nature in NE India, Guwahati.
The Javan gibbon or Owa (Hylobates
moloch ) is one of Indonesia's six gibbon species, a globally
threatened endemic and the rarest among its congeners (Marshall
and Sugardjito, 1986; Eudey, 1987). The main strongholds of this
magnificent lesser ape currently lie in Ujung Kulon National Park
and Mount Halimun National Park in West Java and Mount Slamet
in Central Java (Kappeler, 1981; Asquith, 1995). Current estimates
of its numbers vary between 300 and 2000 (reviewed by Supriatna
et al., 1994). Continuous monitoring, more extensive surveys,
and more systematic studies of this species are desirable.
During 28 - 31 December 1995, we surveyed
Gunung Pongkor (on the northwest of Mount Halimun) to determine
the local status of the gibbon. We recorded gibbons and, in addition,
the grizzled leaf monkey or Surili (Presbytis comata),
another Javan endemic which is threatened. These primates were
observed in hill forest, at an altitudinal range of approximately
500 - 1000 m asl. The locality constitutes an addition to the
24 previously documented localities of the Javan gibbon (Asquith
et al., 1995).
Based on calls and sightings, at least three
groups occured in the survey area, which encompassed approximately
5km2.
On four occasions, visual encounters were made with one to three
individuals foraging in early morning and in late afternoon, but
the brevity of the study did not allow for identification of individuals
or groups. Breeding was indicated by the presence of a female
gibbon with a nursing infant at the forest edge.
The forest habitat with gibbons is inside
a government supported gold mine enterprise, on the northern border
of the national park. The forest is moderately disturbed at many
places due to the mining activities, including the presence of
trails and camps, machinery noises, and underground dynamite explosions.
The forest also is fragmented, having been populated by humans
for at least 50 years, with the accompanying presence of agriculture
and mixed gardens.
Based on limited interviews with the human
population, the gibbon appears to have been hunted rarely, at
least in recent times. Killing gibbons is considered taboo locally.
At times, however, outsiders reportedly have shot adults to capture
infants, to be sold later as pets to city markets. According
to an anonymous hunter/soldier (pers. comm.), such hunters usually
expressed remorse afterwards, having seen that fallen gibbons
can behave "human like", apparently putting their infant's
safety ahead of their own. At Ciguhua village a young gibbon
estimated to be one and a half years old was kept by a local,
who developed an emotional (protective) attachment to the ape
and was unwilling to sell her at any price. The survey has thus
raised an interesting question: if hunting pressure were eliminated,
could the gibbon survive in disturbed forest habitat?
It is tempting to assume that since gibbons
locomote by brachiation that they must require a more or less
closed canopy. We estimate that in a number of places visited
by gibbons the tree canopy cover ranged between 50% and 80%.
Although their habitat has been fragmented and degraded by activities
related to mining, the gibbons appear to exist in considerable
numbers, use the forested areas regularly, as also reported by
Bapak Aten, a National Park ranger (pers. comm.) and reproduce.
The present study seems to indicate that the Javan gibbon may
be able to tolerate disturbed habitats, which perhaps parallels
observations of other gibbon species in Malaysia apparently surviving
in logged forests (Johns and Skorupa, 1987). These observations
provide hope for long term survival of gibbons in mined or disturbed
forest.
Possible mechanisms that could account for
primates surviving in moderately disturbed habitat include the
following. Studies on the orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii
) in Ketambe forest, north Sumatra, by Madhu Rao and Carel
van Schaik (in prep) show that the impact of logging can be compensated
for quite adequately by a change in fruit production, even though
the ape has to spend more time in energetically costly locomotion
foraging in the logged forest. The same thing may be occurring
with gibbons: the intensity of past explosions and local clearing
does not necessarily affect the fruit availibility of remaining
forest for the Javan gibbons (C.P. van Schaik, pers. comm.).
Only long term research will yield the proper answer.
Fragmentation of gibbon habitat may affect
the gene pool, however, by leading to inbreeding of the local
population. We suggest therefore that conserving the existing
forest corridors would be of prime importance in maintaining Javan
gibbon habitat in Gunung Pongkor.
Acknowledgements
This survey was part of a large project
for conservation of the Javan gibbon, supported by Riset Unggulan
Terpadu grant from the Government of Indonesia's Dewan Nasional
(awarded to Dr. Jatna Supriatna). For permits and logistic support,
we thank the most helpful staff members from Gede-Pangrango and
Halimun National Parks and P.T. Aneka Tambang. For able field
assistance, we thank Cheppie M. Kahfi (YABSHI) and Pak Ateng (Halimun
National Park). Helpful discussions and comments were most kindly
provided by Carey Yeager, Carel van Schaik and Warren Y. Brockelman.
References
Asquith, N.M., Martarinza and R.M. Sinaga. (1995) The Javan Gibbon (Hylobates moloch): Status and conservation recommendations. Tropical Biodiversity 3:1-14.
Eudey, A.A., compiler (1987). Action Plan for Asian Primate Conservation: 1987-1991. IUCN - The World Conservation Union, Gland.
Johns, A.D. and J.P.Skorupa. (1987) Responses of rainforest primates to habitat disturbance - A review. International Journal of Primatology 8:157-191.
Kappeler, M. (1984) The gibbon in Java. Pp. 32-43 in Preuschoft, H.L., Chivers, D.J., Brockelman, W.Y. and Creel, N., eds. The Lesser Apes: Evolutionary and Behavioural Biology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Marshall, J.T. and Sugardjito, J. (1986) Gibbon systematics. Pp. 137-185 in Comparative Primate Biology, Volume 1: Systematics, Evolution and Anatomy. Alan R, Liss, New York.
Supriatna, J., Tilson, R., Gurmaya,
K.J., Manangsang, J., Wardojo, W., Sriyanto, A., Teare, A., Castle,
K. and Seal, U.S., eds. (1994) Javan Gibbon and Javan Langur
Population and Habitat Viability Analysis Report. IUCN/SSC
Captive Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN.
The 68th Meeting of the Species Survival
Commission was held on 11-12 October 1996 in Montreal, Canada,
and preceded the first session of the IUCN World Conservation
Congress on 13-23 October 1996.
Species Survival Commission
Russell A. Mittermeier, in his capacity
as chairman, reported on the past triennium's activities of the
Primate Specialist Group. No separate meeting of the PSG was
held. In addition to the specialist group reports and several
sessions on such topics as the Biodiversity Conservation Information
System (BCIS) and the SSC's advisory role to international coventions,
there were Red List training sessions, to experiment with the
application of the new IUCN criteria for threatened species,
and communications working groups, to examine the problems of
implementing action plans, in which all attendees participated.
George Rabb formally stepped down as Chair of the SSC at the
conclusion of the meeting: the George B. Rabb IUCN/SSC Internship
established in his honor was officially announced (see
below).
IUCN Congress Awards
Conservation leaders were honored by IUCN Commissions during the World Conservation Congress. Dr. George B. Rabb, outgoing chair of the Species Survival Commission (SSC), received the Peter Scott Medal for Conservation Merit, presented by Jay Hair, president of IUCN. The Commission on National Parks and Protected areas (CNPPA) presented the Fred M. Packard International Parks Merit Award to three individuals, including two Asian recipients, Mr. H.S. Panwar and Mr. Abeedulah Jan. Mr. Panwar worked to protect natural areas in India for 25 years. He developed India's Project Tiger, one of the world's leading conservation projects. Mr. Jan, during 35 years of service, initiated programs to establish and fund protected areas in Pakistan.
IUCN Election Results
Yolanda Kakabadse, founder and presently
Executive President of the Latin American Future Foundation, Quito,
Ecuador, was elected President of IUCN and became the first woman
and South American to hold the position.
David Brackett, Director General of the Canadian Wildlife Service, was elected Chair of the Species Survival Commission.
The following candidates were selected as
Regional Councillors for Asia. With the exception of Mr. Claparols,
who represents the Ecological Society of the Philippines, all
of those elected had served previously as IUCN Council members.
East Asia
Mr. Antonio Claparols (Philippines)
Mrs. Akiko Domoto (Japan)
Dr. Le Quy An (Vietnam)
West Asia
Dr. Sadiq Al-Muscati (Oman)
Ms. Khawar Mumtaz (Pakistan)
Mr. Mohammad S. Sulayem (Saudi Arabia)
Background
In October
1996, George B. Rabb stepped down after serving seven years as
volunteer Chair of the IUCN Species Survival Commission. Throughout
his career, he has contributed to intellectual, scientific, and
theoretical understanding of wildlife and the strategies required
for its conservation. A herpetologist by training, he began his
career at Chicago's Brookfield Zoo as the Director of Research
and Education, and in 1976 he was appointed Director of the Zoo
and President of the Chicago Zoological Society. In 1976, Dr.
Rabb also began his involvment with IUCN as the representitive
of IUDZG - The World Zoo Organization, the American Zoo and Aquarium
Association (AZA), and the American Society of Ichthyologists
and Herpetologists. He became volunteer Chair of the SSC and
a member of IUCN's Council in 1989, and has taken a leadership
role in building strong links between the international in
situ and ex situ conservation communities with an
emphasis on knowledge and technology exchange.
During Dr. Rabb's tenure as Chair, SSC's
membership has grown from 2,400 to 7,000 volunteer experts in
various fields of wildlife conservation. More importantly, Dr.
Rabb has promoted new ways of thinking and the formation of relevant
and timely new conservation policies and tools such as:
Developing and implementing scientifically based quantitative criteria to assess degrees of extinction threat (IUCN Red List categories);
Forging new understanding and interdisciplinary
approaches needed to create policies on sustainable use of natural
resources and re-introduction of species to their native habitats;
Enabling the volunteer network to
contibute actively to formulation of global policy, and to secure
financial resources needed to implement critical conservation
actions;
Building new networks of expertise
to explore issues of global conservation concern such as possible
links between amphibian population declines and global causes,
and the detrimental impacts of invasive species.
Internship
The George B. Rabb IUCN/SSC Internship
honors Dr. Rabb's important accomplishments on behalf of conservation.
An endowment fund will support one internship per year, to be
awarded to a graduate student pursuing study in the area of conservation
biology or related communications. Interns will work on specific
SSC projects. Students from all areas of the world will be encouraged
to apply.
Location of the internship will vary according
to current SSC programatic priorities and the skills and interests
of the most highly qualified canidates. Options include SSC's
head office (IUCN headquarters, Gland, Switzerland), IUCN regional
and country offices, offices af the SSC Chair and Vice Chairs,
and partner conservation organizations. The SSC Chair, in consultation
with Dr. Rabb and the SSC staff head, will select a panel of experts
to choose the most viable internship candidate.
The George B. Rabb IUCN/SSC Internship Endowment
has been established to support the internship. The minimum gosl
for the endowment is US $200,000; funds exceeding this amount
will support related activities (e.g., publications or meetings
related to the intern's work) and/or additional internship positions.
The George B. Rabb IUCN/SSC Internship will
further SSC's continuing pursuit of knowledge, enhance its role
as a leader in conservation, and continue the legacy begun by
its honoree during his years as SSC Chair.
Donations, or requests for additional
information, may be sent to the following address:
We are pleased to announce the creation
of the Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation, a new charitable
foundation dedicated exclusively to primate conservation. This
foundation was created by the late Margot Marsh of La Jolla, California,
a long-time supporter of a wide variety of primate research and
conservation efforts, who died in May 1995.
I had the great privilege of knowing Margot
Marsh for 13 years, and was able to enjoy her company on various
trips, including one to Madagascar to see lemurs and another to
Kenya and Rwanda to see mountain gorillas and some of the savanna-dwelling
species of Kenya's Masai Mara Reserve. Margot was extremely knowledgeable
about primates and human evolution, not to mention many other
aspects of biodiversity, and was a great friend and supporter
of many of our organizations. We should all be honored that she
saw fit not only to remember us in her will, but also to ensure
that the kinds of projects that she supported during her life
would continue receiving support in the future.
The Primate Specialist Group was specifically
mentioned in Margot's will, as were some of our newsletters, journals
and action plans, so she clearly recognized the value of our group
and the critical role that it plays in global primate conservation
activities. In recognition of this, some of the first projects
supported by the Foundation have been aimed at ensuring the continuity
of publications such as Neotropical Primates
and Asian Primates. We are extremely grateful
to this wonderful friend, and will miss her all very much.
The mission of the Margot Marsh Biodiversity
Foundation is straightforward: "to contribute to global
biodiversity conservation by providing strategically targeted,
catalytic support for the conservation of endangered nonhuman-primates
and their natural habitats".
Project guidelines are as follows, with
preference being given to projects that have one or more of the
following characteristics: (1) projects focusing on endangered
nonhuman primates living in their natural habitats; (2) primate
projects being conducted in areas of high overall biodiversity
and under great threat (e.g. "threatened hotspots",
"megadiversity countries") to ensure maximum multiplier
effect for each project; (3) projects being carried out by nationals
from the tropical countries to increase local capacity for implementing
biodiversity conservation; (4) projects that strengthen international
networks of field-based primate specialists and enhance their
capacity to be successful conservationists; and (5) projects that
result in publication of information on endangered primate species
in a format that is useful both to experts and the general public.
Projects should contribute to at least one,
and preferably more, of the following themes: (1) Enhancement
of scientific understanding/knowledge of the target species/ecosystem;
(2) improved protection of a key species, habitat or reserved
area; (3) demonstration of economic benefit achieved through conservation
of a species and its habitat, as compared to loss thereof; (4)
increased public awareness or educational impact resulting from
the project in question; and (5) improved local capacity to carry
out future conservation efforts through training or practical
experience obtained through project participation. Recipients
of awards should be prepared to designate a nonprofit organization
through which funds can be allocated.
The board of directors of the Margot Marsh
Foundation consists of three members, and an advisory group also
has been created with an additional three members, all of them
selected on the basis of their past relationship with, and knowledge
of the interests of, Margot Marsh. I currently serve as President
of the Board of Directors, and inquiries about how to apply for
support from the foundation can be sent to me at the address below.
* Please note change in address.
Conservation Awards and Grants (up to US$1500, but usually US$500) Grant proposals are solicited for conservation research or related projects, including conservation education. ASP and IPS members working in habitat countries are especially urged to apply or to help someone from a habitat country submit a meaningful project which can be a portion of a larger effort. Grant proposals must be typed in English, should not exceed 2000 words and should include a brief budget page. Recipients of grants must agree that a brief progress report, in a form suitable for publication in the ASP Bulletin, will be made within 12 months of the award. Requests for emergency support can be considered at any time for immediate action.
Subscription Award This award provides the American Journal of Primatology to worthy individuals in habitat countries who otherwise would have little access to the scientific literature on nonhuman primates. The ASP expects to support several continuing subscription awards. A nominating letter should describe the nominee's credentials and his/her related activities, and should explain why the nominee deserves to receive high priority.
Conservation Award (US$500) For students and young investigators from habitat countries who demonstrate potential for making significant and continuing contributions to primate conservation.
Senior Biology and Conservation Award
(US $500 Honorarium) This award is one of ASP's highest honors.
It is given to recognize an individual without an advanced degree
who has made substantial contributions over many years to promote
primate conservation either through direct action or via enhancement
of biological knowledge or well-being of primates.
The 1997 deadline for submission of nominations
and grant proposals is 23 May 1997. All awards require nominating
letters. Materials should be sent to:
The Primate Society of Great Britain (PSGB)
often receives requests for grants in support of primate studies
through its Conservation Working Party. Because the Society has
only relatively small amounts available in the Conservation Appeal
Fund, grants are confined to specific topics. The following information
is designed to show potential applicants how to apply and to help
determine who is eligible.
Proposal Guidelines Proposals are
invited for grants to assist with: (1)research of benefit to primate
conservation; (2) short surveys to identify locations of value
to primate conservation; and (3) projects involving primate conservation
education.
Obligations of Grantee Grant recipients
are required to present a report on the progress of the project
within six months of commencement. A final report is due on completion
of the project that may be used by PSGB, at its discretion, in
publications, or in any way thought to be of value to primate
conservation. Any publications resulting from the project should
acknowledge the support received from PSGB, and copies of these
publications should be sent to PSGB. Grantees are requested to
produce slides and/or sound recordings, where appropriate, for
non-commercial use by PSGB or others to benefit primate conservation.
Award Basis Applications are to
be received by 1 March or 1 September of each year. Individual
awards will be for a sum not typically exceeding 250 pounds. Award
applications will be considered by the Conservation Working Party
at its next meeting following receipt of applications. If two
or more objections are raised by members of the CWP, the convener
may, if he/she thinks fit, request the applicant to submit an
amended application that addresses the committee's reservations.
Grants will be awarded to members of PSGB, or to citizens of
primate habitat countries who are sponsored by a PSGB member.
Group training projects are not covered by this award scheme.
Recent awards include 300 pounds to the Black Lemur Forest Project, Madagascar, to employ a Malagasy education officer for 6 months; and 300 pounds for the IUCN/SSC Regional Primate Specialist Groups in south and north-east India and Bangladesh, to facilitate communication among these groups.
Application forms are available from:
The XIVth Congress of the International
Primatological Society (IPS) and the XIXth Conference of the American
Society of Primatologists (ASP) were held jointly in Madison,
Wisconsin, USA, from 11-16 August 1996, and hosted by the Wisconsin
Regional Primate Research Center (WRPRC) at the University of
Wisconsin. Dr. John P. Hearn was chairman of the Congress. The
Congress was attended by approximately 1,300 people, making it
one of the largest on record. Forty-three countries were represented.
The Congress was preceded by a two-day workshop on methods in
primate conservation, organized by Jeanne Altmann, outgoing Vice
President for Conservation, and hosted by the Brookfield Zoo,
Chicago, Illinois. The 24 participants in the workshop included
representatives from China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Nepal and India.
The scientific program included 544 papers
and other talks and 259 posters covering all fields of primate
research. Plenary sessions included "Mahale Chimpanzees
Studies: Past, Present and Future" by T. Nishida, Kyoto University,
Japan, the incoming president of IPS, and "Towards a New
Understanding of the Ecology and Phylogeny of the Callitrichidae"
by A.B. Rylands, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, editor
of Neotropical Primates and the new Deputy Chairman
of the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. The three-part conservation
symposium of the Primate Specialist Group is described below.
A number of special interest group meetings
were held during the Congress. Participants in the Indo-U.S.
Primate Project, including S.M. Mohnot, A. Srivastava and C. H.
Southwick, met with other interested individuals on two occasions.
There was one meeting of a Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos Interest
Group; Noel Rowe, of Primate Conservation, Inc. (e-mail: 74227.2342@compuserve.com),
volunteered to coordinate informal communication among primatologists
working, or interested, in the region.
The results of a competition to determine
the best films/videos produced in the area of primatology since
1990 were announced during the meeting. There were two categories
of entries: (1) professional films, with budgets above $25,000;
(2) non-professional, independent productions. "Preliminary
survey of the social organization of Rhinopithecus roxellana
in Shennongjia National Natural Reserve, Hubei, China", directed
by Renmei Ren, Department of Psychology, Peking University, was
ranked first in the non-professional category.
Actions of the IPS Council included a vote
to award the 1996 Galante Fellowship to Mr. Daoying Lan. Mr.
Lan is currently enrolled in graduate study at the University
of Liverpool, under the supervision of Dr. Robin Dunbar. Previously
Mr. Lan was affiliated with the Kunming Institute of Zoology,
Kunming, Yunnan, China, and Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou,
China. Mr. Lan will use the Galante Fellowship to further his
doctoral research on the behavior, ecology and conservation of
black gibbons (Hylobates concolor)
in southwest Yunnan. The new officers of IPS were introduced
at the business meeting (see
below). The next IPS Congress will
be held in Antananarivo, Madagascar in September - October 1998
(See Meetings, this issue, for
more information). [Some
information was abstracted from the IPS Bulletin
23(2) and Neotropical Primates 4(3).]
The major conservation event at the joint
IPS/ASP Congress was a one-and-a-half day symposium organized
by the Primate Specialist Group Chairman, Russell A. Mittermeier,
and former Deputy Chairman, William R. Konstant, along with the
Regional Vice Chairpersons, Ardith Eudey (Asia), Tom Butynski
(Africa), and Anthony Rylands and Ernesto Rodriguez-Luna (Neotropics).
No separate meeting of PSG members was held.
There were three parts to the symposium.
The first was entitled "Primate Conservation at the End
of the 21st Century - A 20-Year Retrospective and a Look at the
Next Millenium". Russell Mittermeier introduced the symposium
and its objectives and reviewed global primate distributions,
priority countries and regions and the current conservation status
of species and subspecies. The history of the PSG was reviewed,
and the PSG's activities were highlighted with the development
of the Global Strategy for Primate Conservation in 1978, the World
Wildlife Fund Primate Program, begun in 1979, the Primate Action
Plans of the late 1980's and early 1990's, and the creation of
networks for primate conservation around the world. William Konstant
provided a historical review of funding sources for primate conservation.
This was followed by regional reports of PSG activities and the
situation in the Neotropics (Anthony Rylands and Ernesto Rodriguez-Luna),
Asia (Ardith Eudey), Africa (Thomas Butynski) and Madagascar (Jorg
Ganzhorn and Patricia Wright), along with a history of the role
of IPS, ASP, the Primate Society of Great Britain (PSGB) and other
institutions in primate conservation (David Chivers), a review
of the development and application of tools and processes for
scientifically-based management strategies for threatened species,
based on small population and conservation biology (Susie Ellis),
and the role of zoos in primate conservation (Anne Baker).
The second part of the symposium, entitled "Case Studies of the Critically Endangered and the Future", reviewed the conservation status of the primates most likely to go extinct in the 21st century. Twelve papers were presented which reviewed the current status of critically endangered and endangered species and species groups around the world. The Asian case studies were on the snub-nosed monkeys of China (R.M. Ren, R.C. Kirkpatrick and N.G. Jablonski); the Vietnamese snub-nosed monkey, langurs and gibbons (X.C. Le); the Javan gibbons (J. Supriatna, N. Andayani, D. Buchori, D. Supriyadi and S. Sueryadi); the four primates endemic to the Mentawai Islands (A. Fuentes); and the Japanese macaques of Yakushima (D.A. Hill and T. Maruhashi). S.M. Mohnot talked about the Indo-US Primate Project, in place of Ajith Kumar, who was to review the status of the lion-tailed macaque of the Western Ghats in India.
The final part of the symposium involved
a round table discussion concerning the role of major multilateral
financing and development agencies, priorities for the future,
an action plan agenda, and the prospects for survival of the threatened
species around the world. (Abstracted,
with modifications, from R.A. Mittermeier, Neotropical Primates
4(3):89-90 [1996].)
President
Prof. Toshishada Nishida
Department of Anthropology
Graduate School of Science
Kyoto University
Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi 606 JAPAN
Tel: 81-75-753-4084
Fax: 81-75-751-6149
e-mail: nishida@jinrui.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Secretary General
Dr. Dorothy Fragaszy
Department of Psychology
University of Georgia
Athens GA. 30602 USA
Tel: 706-542-3036
Fax: 706-542-3275
e-mail: cmspsy37@uga.cc.uga.edu
Vice President for Membership
Dr. Richard W. Byrne
Department of Psychology
University of St. Andrews
St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9JU SCOTLAND, U.K.
Tel: 44-334-62051
FAX: 44-334-63042
e-mail: rwb@st.andrews.ac.uk
Vice President for Captive Care
Dr. Cobie Brinkman
Division of Psychology
Australian National University
GPO Box 4, Canberra
ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA
Tel: 61-6-249-2803
FAX: 61-6-249-0499
e-mail: cobie.brinkman@anu.edu.au
Vice President for Conservation
Dr. Ernesto Rodriquez-Luna
Instituto de Neuroetologia
Universidad Veracruzana
Veracruz 91000 MEXICO
Tel: 52-28-12-57-48
FAX: 52-28-17-63-39 or 52-28-12-57-46
e-mail: saraguat @speedy.coacade.uv.mx
Treasurer
Dr. William Roudebush
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical
University of South Carolina
Charleston, SC 29425-2233 USA
Tel: 803-792-8348
Fax: 803-792-5033
e-mail: roudebwe@lp.musc.edu
Regional Secretary for Asia
Prof. Osamu Takenaka
Department of Biochemistry
Primate Research Institute
Kyoto University
Inuyama, Aichi 484 JAPAN
The Wisconsin Regional Primate Research
Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, announces the publication
of the third edition of the International Directory of Primatology.
The directory is divided into five organizational sections and
four indexes. The organizational sections cover (1) geographically
arranged entries for major primate centers, laboratories, educational
programs, foundations, conservation agencies and sanctuaries;
(2) field studies; (3) groups involved with nonhuman primate population
management; (4) professional primate societies, including the
membership roster of the International Primatological Society;
and (5) major information resources in the field. Access to this
information is supported by organizational, species, subject and
name indexes.
Copies of the 1996 edition (391 pp., spiral
bound) are available in the USA for $25 each, or for other countries
for US$35 each via book rate. Air mail to Canada and Mexico is
US$40, while air mail outside of North America is US$50. Prices
include postage and handling. Checks should be made payable to:
Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center.
To order a copy, please contact:
The Pictorial Guide To The Living
Primates, by Noel Rowe,
beautifully illustrates the diversity of the primate order. The
book was published by Pogonias Press, East Hampton, New York,
in 1996. The work is organized like a field guide and provides
the reader with color photographs, basic information and a range
map for each prosimian, monkey and ape. Each species is treated
separately, with at least one photograph or illustration of 234
species. Following the taxonomy of Colin P. Groves, the publication
includes most of the new species which have been described in
the last decade. The book has a strong conservation message and
provides the current level of endangerment for each species.
The foreword is by Jane Goodall, with an introduction by Russell
A. Mittermeier, chairman of the Primate Specialist Group.
Pogonias Press is offeringThe Pictorial
Guide to Living Primates at a special discount of 10%
to readers of Asian Primates. Hard bound editions
are available at US$71.96, and soft bound copies are available
at US$53.96. (Residents of New
York are required to add state tax.)
Postage within the USA for each copy is $4.95. For countries
other than than the USA, please pay by international money order
in US dollars plus $10.00 for shipping and handling. Mastercard
and Visa also are acceptable. Shipment is by air mail whenever
possible; surface mail may require 3-6 weeks. Please contact
the following address for orders or additional information:
The second International Conference on Indo-Australian Vertebrate Fauna will be held at the Lombok Intan Laguna Hotel, Senggigi Beach, Mataram, on the island of Lombok, Indonesia, on 10-13 December 1996.
From a zoogeographical standpoint, eastern
Indonesia comprises the Wallacean region (from Sulawesi and Lombok
to the Mollucan islands and Lesser Sunda islands) and Irian Jaya.
The region is rich in endemic, unique and characteristic vertebrate
species that are becoming rare or extinct due to the increasing
human population and development. The fauna is poorly known biologically
and ecologically. The objective of the conference, under the
theme of "Responding to the Challenge of Global Change",
is to gather scientific data on the biology, ecology and social
relevance of the existing vertebrate species to develop an action
plan for their sustainable use and conservation, with special
emphasis on linking ecotourism with biodiversity conservation.
The deadline for abstracts to be received is 1 November 1996.
All correspondence should be addressed to:
The Second International Wildlife
Law Conference will be held on 8 April 1997. The Conference will
bring together representatives from the academic, governmental
and non-governmental sectors to focus upon the role of international
wildlife treaty regimes in preserving biological diversity, and
how these regimes can be strengthened to achieve this objective.
Papers growing out of this conference will appear in a special
symposium issue of the Colorado Journal of International
Environmental Law & Policy. The program will include
the following.
Panel #1 will focus on the operation of the precautionary principle in the context of international wildlife agreements, including the contours of the principle in specific treaty regimes, the appropriate standards for applying the principle, and an assessment of its efficacy in protecting the viability of flora and fauna species.
Panel #2 will examine the operation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), including its interaction with international wildlife conservation agreements and its implementation at the international, regional and national levels. Several speakers will speculate on the future viability of the CBD.
Panel #3 will examine one of the
most controversial aspects of the International Convention for
the Regulation of Whaling: the aboriginal subsistence whaling
provision. Speakers will focus on the tension between cetacean
conservation and the recognition of aboriginal peoples' rights
under international law; the recent application by the Makah
Tribe of the US for a grey whale quota under the provision, and
the future implications of permitting aboriginal whaling outside
the framework of the IWC moratorium on whaling.
Additional information may be obtained from:
A joint meeting on the Nutrition of Wild
and Captive Wild Animals will be held by the Nutrition
Society, Royal Zoological Society of Scotland and British Federation
of Zoos at Edinburgh Zoo, Scotland, on 16-18 May 1997. Organizers
of the meeting are Dr. Rob Young and Dr. Chris Seal. Speakers
include: Ellen Dierenfeld, "Nutrition of captive wild birds
- historical perspective"; Sue Crissey, "Utilizing
wild foraging ecology information to provide captive primates
with an appropiate diet"; Donald Lindburg, "Behaviour
and nutrition of captive wild animals"; John Speakman, "Small
mammal nutrition, torpor, hibernation and foraging energetics".
The deadline for poster and oral communications
is 1 March 1997. For further information contact:
Edinburgh Zoo, in
conjunction with the University of Edinburgh, has devised a new
course in Animal Behaviour and Welfare. The course will take
an animal centered approach. It will focus primarily on practical
methods of improving animal welfare, which will be underpinned
by a sound theoretical background. For example, a large portion
of the course will focus on methods of environmental enrichment,
such as management regimes and the use of devices. However, a
clear distinction will be made between environmental enrichment
that cures or improves a welfare problem from that which only
hides it or treats its symptoms. The course is divided into four
parts: (1) Methods of measuring and recording the behavior of
animals; (2) Assessing the welfare status of captive animals;
(3) "Global zoo perspective", or how zoos' efforts in
conservation are linked with animal welfare; (4) Environmental
enrichment.
The course fee is 719.15 (+VAT) pounds sterling.
This fee includes lunches and course materials. Airfare and
accommodations are not included. A special package is available
for accommodations at the University's apartments at the cost
of 161.70 (+VAT) pounds sterling. No scholarships are available.
Registrants requiring financial assistance should seek alternative
sources. The deadline for registration is 31 May 1997. To receive
further information please contact:
The Orangutan Foundation Internationl (OFI)
and the Tourist Promotion Boards of Malaysia and Sarawak will
co-organize and co-sponsor the Third Great Apes of the World Conference
to be held in Sarawak, Malaysia, during 4-7 November 1997 (tentative
dates). The conference will be a follow-up to the Second International
Great Apes Conference held in Indonesia in December 1991, which
OFI co-sponsored with three Indonesian ministries.
The 1997 four-day conference will be held in Kuching, Sarawak. Pre and post conference tours are being planned for participants to biologically and culturally diverse areas of Malaysia and Indonesia. The conference also will be co-sponsored by Malaysia Airlines, the official airline for the conference.
The planned conference will feature over two dozen great ape specialists who will focus on a variety of issues ranging from behavioral ecology to captive management and from the impact of ecotourism to solutions in wildlife conservation. This announcement should be considered as a call for papers. Several individuals will be invited to be keynote speakers. Following the conference, OFI plans to publish the proceedings of the conference. OFI will begin accepting abstracts 1 January 1997 and papers from 15 April 1997.
The conference will be open to the public
with special rates being offered on airfare and hotels by the
co-sponsors. More details may be obtained from:
Faculty in the Department of Biology, University of Chiang Mai, in northern Thailand, are in the process of developing a teaching and research library on wildlife studies, including such topics as species habitats, conservation, management, field techniques, ecology and behavior. The faculty involved are Dr. Narit Sitasuwan, Ms. Nantiya Aggimarangsee, M.S., and Dr. Ramesh Boonratana. Currently the only literature available for student and faculty use on wildlife study is in private collections. Donations of journals, magazines, reference books, dissertations, reports and research papers would be appreciated.
Literature may be sent to the following
address:
Three back issues of Primate Conservation,
the journal of the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group,
have been published under the editorship of Anthony B. Rylands.
Numbers 12-13 (1991/1992) contain two articles on the Asian region:
R.P. Mukherjee, S. Chaudhuri and A. Murmu, "Hoolock gibbons
(Hylobates hoolock) in Arunachal Pradesh, northeast
India: The Lohit district"; Ardith A. Eudey, "Captive
gibbons in Thailand and the option of reintroduction to the wild".
Numbers 14-15 (1993/1994) contain a special
section edited by Robert C. Lacy on the Primate Population Viability
Analysis Symposium held at the XVth Congress of the International
Primatological Society in Bali, Indonesia, in 1994. Specific
articles include: Warren Y. Brockelman, "PHVA workshop:
Learning to help the gibbons of Thailand".
Number 16 (1995) contains five articles
on the Asian region: Ajith Kumar, G. Umapathy and A. Prabhakar,
"A study on the management and conservation of small mammals
in fragmented rain forests in the Western Ghats, south India:
A preliminary report"; T.R. Shankar Raman, Charudutt Mishra
and A.J.T. Johnsingh, "Survey of primates in Mizoram, north-east
India"; Rob J. Lee, "Population survey of the crested
black macaque (Macaca nigra) at Manembonembo Nature
Reserve in North Sulawesi, Indonesia"; Vincent Nijman, "Remarks
on the occurrence of gibbons in central Java"; Douglas Brandon-
Jones, "Presbytis fredericae (Sody, 1930),
an endangered Colobine species endemic to central Java, Indonesia".
Information on submissions to Primate
Conservation may be obtained from the editors:
Members of the PSG receive complimentary
copies of Primate Conservation. The publication
is available to non-members for US$15.00 per issue (including
postage and handling). For more information, contact:
* Please note change in address.
A Survey of Wildlife Trade in Guangxi and Guangdong, China. Li Wenjun, Todd K. Fuller and Wang Sung, TRAFFIC BULLETIN 16(1):9-16.
Summary: The
incidence of wildlife in trade in southern China has increased
significantly following the growth in the country's economy and
an expanding human population. In 1994, the authors carried out
a survey of the trade in Guangdong Province and Guangxi Zhuang
Nationality Autonomous Region, and areas along the border with
Vietnam. Their findings indicate that, although some achievements
have been made in regulating the trade, more vigorous implementation
of wildlife legislation is urgently required. At a minimum, increased
financial resources and training must be provided to wildlife
officials in both China and Vietnam if trade control mechanisms
in the region are to be strengthened. Animals traded in the largest
quantities and available in most of the markets surveyed included
primates (including Class I-listed pigtail macaque [Macaca
nemestrina] and Francois' leaf monkey [Trachypithecus
francoisi]). In Guangxi, the species most often confiscated
in illegal trade were primates (stumptail macaque [Macaca
arctoides], crab-eating macaque [M. fascicularis],
rhesus macaque [M. mulatta], pigtail macaque and
Francois' leaf monkey). Protected species most commonly in trade
and confiscated in Shaoguan Prefecture of Guangdong Province between
1990 and 1994 include primates (stumptail and rhesus macaques).
According to local wildlife officers, between 30% and 40% of
these animals died following poor treatment and transportation
facilites. Around half were released into nature reserves or
other "natural habitats", and a small number were sent
to wildlife breeding centers or zoos. Species that were frequently
seen and available in most of the markets surveyed along the Guangxi-Vietnam
border included Francois' leaf monkey (Class I), rhesus macaque
and slow loris (Nycticebus coucang ) [Class
I]. These are the animals most often offered at restaurants in
Guangdong and Guangxi.
The Neglected Ape. Ronald D. Nadler, Birute M.F. Galdikas, Lori K. Sheeran, and Norm Rosen, editors. Plenum Press, New York, 1995.
Summary: In the past, scientific and public attention has centered on the African apes. For this reason, the sole Asian great ape, the orang-utan, has been called the "neglected ape." Over the last several years, however, this situation has been changing. In 1991, the government of Indonesia sponsored the International Great Ape Conference, which was held at Jakarta, Pangkalan Bun and Camp Leakey, Kalimantan Tengah. As the last official event for "Visit Indonesia Year 1991," this conference heralded a new era in awareness of the orang-utan and its plight as an endangered species. Following the Great Ape Conference, the first Population and Habitat Viablility Analysis Workshop for orang-utans was held in Medan, North Sumatra. Working groups established at the workshop made contributions to the Indonesian Orangutan Action Plan, designed to ensure the survival of orang-utans in their natural habitats. The following year, an international conference entitled "Orangutans: The Neglected Ape" was held at California State University, Fullerton. The conference brought together some 200 academic scientists, zoo personnel, field biologists, government officaials, and concerned lay people from Europe, Southeast Asia, and North America. This volume is a direct outgrowth of the Neglected Ape Conference in Fullerton and the Orangutan PHVA workshop in Medan. Section One provides an overview of the orang-utan species, its past and current status and its predicament, as seen through the eyes of philosophers, conservationists, and a psychologist. Section Two is devoted to orang-utan conservation and recovery plans. Section Three is devoted to demography. In Section Four, research results are presented from the two locations where long-term field studies have been conducted: Tanjung Puting and Gunung Leuser National Parks. Section Five is devoted to scientific research on the social and sexual behavior, reproduction and physical development of orang-utans and to their maintenance and propagation in captivity.
A Preliminary Survey of Long-Tailed and Pig-Tailed Macaques (Macaca fascicularis and Macaca nemestrina) in Lampung, Bengkulu, and Jambi Provinces, Southern Sumatera, Indonesia. Jatna Supriatna, Achmad Yanuar, Martarinza, Hario Tabah Wibisono, Ridwan Sinaga, Irvan Sidik, and Sofian Oskandar. Tropical Biodiversity 3(2):131-140,1996.
Abstract:
We present data from a population survey of long-tailed and pig-tailed
macaques (Macaca fascicularis and Macaca
nemestrina, respectively) within Lampung, Bengkulu and
Jambi Provinces in Southern Sumatera. Macaques were encountered
at densities ranging from 3.9 individuals/km2 to 122 individuals/km2
for M. fascicularis, and 2.5 individuals/km2 to
14 individuals/km2 for M. nemestrina. Estimated
density figures for M. fascicularis, which
was more commonly found in variable types of forests, was consistent
with previous surveys made by Wilson and Wilson in 1977. However,
a serious population decline seems to have occurred in M.
nemestrina. Little information was obtained for
macaque densities at higher altitudes. Rough extrapolations from
available land use information resulted in estimates of minimum
numbers of M. fascicularis and M. nemestrina
for the three Southern Sumatera localities: 300,000 for
Lampung, 450,000 for Bengkulu, and 1,300,000 for Jambi.
A Census and the Biogeography of Golden Langurs (Presbytis geei) in Bhutan. Tashi Wangchuk. TigerPaper 22(3): 1-6, 1995.
Abstract: A census of Golden langurs (Presbytis geei), locally called Raksha, was conducted in the Mangde Chu Valley of Central Bhutan. The census transect fell within the newly established Black Mountain National Park. A total of 127 individuals were sighted along the 39 km transect. Using the arithmetic mean of all animal-to-transect distance as transect width, an area of 58.5 km2 was covered as the sampling area. This resulted in an estimated density of 2.1 Golden langurs per km2 in the sample area. Using this figure with the basic formula for density calculation and the estimated distribution and ecology of Raksha, a total of 4,341 Golden langurs are estimated to survive in Bhutan.
Also, the distribution of Golden
langurs in Bhutan was mapped through field surveys conducted along
natural dispersal barriers such as the Sankosh river in the west
and the Manas/Drangme Chu in the east. It was found that Hanuman
or Grey langurs (Presbytis entellus)
are able to cross the Sankosh into P. geei range
due to the construction of bridges in the last two decades. The
two species may be interbreeding in the Tsirang area.
Gibbon Systematics and Species Identification. Thomas Geissmann, International Zoo News 42(8):467-501, 1995.
Abstract: A
study of wild and captive gibbons and museum specimens, and a
survey of the literature, suggests that gibbons (genus Hylobates)
include at least 11, possibly 12, species, which form four distinct
groups (subgenera Hylobates, Bunopithecus, Nomascus,
and Symphalangus): these are the 44-chromosome
gibbons (including the Hylobates lar group
and H. klossii ( 6 species); the hoolock
(H. hoolock, 1 species); the H. concolor
group (3, possibly 4, species); and the siamang (H.
syndactylus, 1 species). A key for the identification
of adult gibbons based on visual characteristics is presented,
together with colour photographs and distribution maps of all
recognised species (11). In addition, diagnostic vocal characteristics
of all species are described and illustrated with sonagrams.
(This paper is a revised and much enlarged version of an article
which was originally published in German in Zeitschrift
des Kolner Zoo 37(2): 65-77, 1994.)
Limitations of Captive Breeding in Endangered Species Recovery. Noel F.R. Snyder, Scott R. Derrickson, Steven R. Beissinger, James W. Wiley, Thomas B. Smith, William D. Toone and Brian Miller. Conservation Biology 10(2):338-348, 1996.
Abstract: The
use of captive breeding in species recovery has grown enormously
in recent years, but without a concurrent growth in appreciation
of its limitations. Problems with (1) establishing self-sufficient
captive populations, (2) poor success in reintroductions, (3)
high costs, (4) domestication, (5) preemption of other recovery
techniques, (6) disease outbreaks, and (7) maintaining administrative
continuity have all been significant. The technique has often
been invoked prematurely and should not normally be employed before
a careful field evaluation of costs and benefits of all conservation
alternatives has been accomplished and a determination made that
captive breeding is essential for species survival. Merely demonstrating
that a species' population is declining or has fallen below what
may be a minimum viable size does not constitute enough analysis
to justify captive breeding as a recovery measure. Captive breeding
should be viewed as a last resort in species recovery and not
a prophylactic or long-term solution because of the inexorable
genetic and phenotypic changes that occur in captive environments.
Captive breeding can play a crucial role in recovery of some species
for which effective alternatives are unavailable in the short
term. However, it should not displace habitat and ecosystem protection
nor should it be invoked in the absence of comprehensive efforts
to maintain or restore populations in wild habitats. Zoological
institutions with captive breeding programs should operate under
carefully defined conditions of disease prevention and genetic/behavioral
management. More important, these institutions should help preserve
biodiversity through their capacities for public education, professional
training, research, and support of in situ conservation efforts.
African Primates: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, Revised Edition. John F. Oates, compiler. IUCN, Gland. Switzerland, 1996.
Summary: This is a fully revised edition of the Action Plan for African Primate Conservation, first published by the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group in 1986. The plan deals with primates of continental Africa, excluding Madagascar. Sixty-four species (15 prosimians, 46 monkeys and 3 apes) are recognized in the plan, which takes account of new taxonomic research.
A revised system is used to rate species for conservation action. Species are rated on a scale of 1-5 for the degree of threat they face, and either 1 or 2 points are added based on their taxonomic distinctiveness. The threat ratings are compatible with, but not identical to, the new IUCN categories. Under this rating system, the drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) is the highest ranked species for action. This plan gives more attention to threatened subspecies. Forty-three subspecies and distinct local populations are identified as deserving of special conservation attention and are prioritized for action.
As in the previous plan, important
sites for conservation action are identified based on the recognition
of distinct regional communities. The original plan listed 42
projects across 11 regional communities. These projects included
both basic surveys and reserve management schemes. The new plan
reviews what action has been taken on these projects in the last
10 years: some action has been taken on 38 projects, but in 10
cases this action has been interrupted by civil war or other political
instability, a growing impediment to effective conservation in
Africa. Based on this review, specific recommendations for further
action are made, including 24 high priority projects, of which
political factors mitigate against immediate action on six, and
the preparation and implementation of a Red Colobus Conservation
Action Plan.
1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1996.
Summary: The 1996 Red List was compiled and edited by Jonathan Baillie and Brian Groombridge in association with experts in the IUCN Species Survival Commission, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Birdlife International and The Nature Conservancy. With the listing of 5,205 threatened taxa, it is the most comprehensive inventory ever of threatened species and subspecies (and populations) on a global scale: the conservation status of every mammal species in the world, following the earlier comprehensive evaluation of birds, is assessed for the first time and the number of invertebrate and fish species included has risen sharply.
The new IUCN categories (Critically
Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable) and criteria, approved
by IUCN council in 1994, have been adopted and applied in order
to achieve a more objective system for classifying conservation
status that allows comparisons to be made across species in assessing
likelihood of extinction. Details of the new system can be found
in the section entitled The New IUCN Categories and Criteria and
in Annex 2. The format of the publication has been changed to
appeal to a much wider audience while retaining scientific content,
and, where possible, common names have been included for all species
and subspecies. The following lists are included: List 1. Threatened
Species; List 2. Lower Risk: conservation dependent; List 3.
Lower Risk: near threatened; List 4. Extinct and Extinct in
the Wild; List 5. Data Deficient; List 6. Subspecies and Populations;
List 7. Taxa Removed from the 1996 Red List. A comprehensive
index including families follows the listings.
A Pocket Guide to IUCN - The World Conservation Union, 1996-1997. IUCN. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1996.
Summary: IUCN is a unique union of more than 880 state, government agency and NGO members spread across 133 countries. It also is a network of environmental expertise made up of IUCN staff and more than 8,000 volunteer scientists and practitioners contributing to conservation through IUCN's six global commissions. The pocket guide provides six entry points to gain access to this multifaceted resource of people, networks, programs and publications: Table of Contents; General Information on IUCN; Thematic Programmes and Networks; Six Global Commissions, including the Species Survival Commission; Regional/Country Offices and Programmes; and Information Resources. The guide will be updated periodically.
The IUCN Publications Catalogue 1996-1997,
which incorporates publications from the Ramsar Convention on
Wetlands, TRAFFIC International and the World Conservation Monitoring
Centre, and all IUCN publications may be ordered from:
For all North American sales inquiries,
contact:
This issue of Asian Primates is
dedicated to the memory of Elsie R. Marshall, who died in January
1997. She was the wife of Joe T. Marshall and his helpmeet in
every sense of the word. The lives of those of us who were fortunate
enough to enjoy her friendship were enriched indeed.
Financial support for the production and distribution of Asian Primates was provided by the Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation.
On 15 July 1996, the 1995 Forbes
list of the world's wealthiest individuals was released. Half
of the top ten are Asian, reflecting the region's growing prominence
and economic clout. Asia's contribution to global economic output
has risen from 17 percent in 1980 to 25 percent today. Of the
447 billionaires counted by Forbes, 123 are Asian. The number
of Asian billionaires by country is: Hong Kong, 19; India, 3;
Indonesia, 10; Japan, 41; South Korea, 7; Malaysia, 11; Philippines,
9; Singapore, 4; Taiwan, 7; Thailand, 10. The total number of
billionaires in Japan remained the same at 41 from 1991 to 1996,
while the number of billionaires in the rest of Asia increased
from 27 in 1991 to 82 in 1996.
On 10 September 1996, the People's
Republic of China sent a pair of giant pandas (Ailuropoda
melanoleuca) to the San Diego Zoo in California. The
pandas will remain at the zoo for 12 years under terms of a loan
agreement. The two are the first pandas to be allowed into the
United States since 1993 when officials banned the importation
of the endangered species. The position changed 18 months later
when the zoo pledged to focus on research on the pandas, to be
conducted by the zoo's Center for the Reproduction of Endangered
Species (CRES), more than on public exhibit. Under terms of the
agreement with the Chinese government, the zoo will donate US$1
million annually to habitat preservation projects in China. The
zoo will pay the Chinese up to US$600,000 depending on how long
a cub survives, but any offspring born in San Diego remain Chinese
property and will be sent to China within three years. Earlier,
on 21 July 1996, two white rhinos (Ceratotherium simum)being
sent as a goodwill gift by the San Diego Zoo died apparently from
heat and dehydration while being trucked over 1,900 km from Shanghai
to the Chengdu Zoo in western China. The San Diego Zoo is reported
not to have sent specialists with the rhinos for the Chinese leg
of the trip, and the Chengdu Zoo is reported to have deviated
from a plan to transport the rhinos by rail.
On 11 October 1996, The 1996 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Roman Catholic Bishop Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo and political activist Jose Ramos-Horta, two leading figures pressing to bring peace to the troubled region of East Timor. Ramos-Horta represents the largest of East Timor's opposition guerrilla groups, Fretilin. Civil war broke out in East Timor in 1975 on the eve of independence from Portugal. Indonesia then invaded East Timor and annexed it, a move that remains unrecognized by the United Nations. In the years that followed, it has been estimated that one-third of the population of East Timor, now roughly 720,000, died due to starvation, epidemics, war and terror.
This column will resume its regular coverage of socioeconomic and sociopolitical events relevant to conservation action in Asia with vol. 6, no. 1.
Second Annual International Wildlife
Law Conference, 8 April 1997,Washington,
DC, USA. Contact: David Favre, Detroit College of Law at Michigan
State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Nutrition of Wild and Captive Wild Animals, 16-18 May 1997, Edinburgh Zoo, Edinburgh, UNITED KINGDOM. Contact: Rodney Warick, The Nutrition Society, 10 Cambridge Court, 210 Shepherds Bush Road, London W6 7NJ, UNITED KINGDOM. Fax: 44-171-602-1756.
e-mail: 100672.2151@compuserve.com
The Tenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, 9-10 June 1997, Harare, Zimbabwe. A Global Biodiversity Forum to promote links between CITES and the Convention on Biodivesity will precede the meeting on 7-8 June 1997. Contact: Simon Stuart, Head, Species Programme, IUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, SWITZERLAND. Fax: 41-22-999-00-02.
e-mail: sns@hq.iucn.org
Zoo Animal Behaviour and Welfare International Summer School, 7-18 July 1997, Edinburgh Zoo, Edinburgh, SCOTLAND, U.K. Contact: Hamish Macandrew, UnivEd Training and Conference Centre, UnivEd Technologies Ltd., 11 South College Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AA, SCOTLAND U.K.
Fax: 0131 650 9019
The Third International Great Apes
World Conference, 4-8 November
1997,
Kuching, Sarawak MALAYSIA.Co-sponsored by Orangutan Foundation
International, the Malaysian Tourist Promotion Board and Malaysia
Airlines. Contact: Gary Shapiro, OFI, 822 S. Wellesley Ave.,
Los Angeles CA, 90049, USA. Fax: 310-207-1556. e-mail: redape@ns.net.
http://www.ns.net/orangutan
XVIIth Congress of the International
Primatological Society
, 18 September- 2 October 1998 Anatananarivo, Madagascar. The
meeting will be housed at the University of Antananarivo. Contact
for registration forms and other documents: the Secretary of
the XVIIth Congress of the International Primatological Society,
Faculty of Sciences, Building P, Door 207, B.P. 906, Antananarivo,
MADAGASCAR.
Asian Primates is published by the Primate Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, IUCN - The World Conservation Union, and Conservation International. Please direct all questions, comments and materials for submission to:
Back Issues:
URL: http://www.primate.wisc.edu/pin/news/Asian.5.3.html
Page last modified:
February 19, 2002
Maintained by the WPRC Library